Mental Models6 min read

First Principles Thinking Examples: How to Break Down Any Problem

Dan Hartman headshotDan Hartman— Editor··6 min read

Stop getting stuck. Learn how to use first principles thinking examples to dismantle complex problems, find clear solutions, and make better decisions in your work and life. Gain mental clarity.

Last month, I was staring at a project brief that felt like a brick wall. The client wanted a new onboarding flow for their SaaS product, but their existing system was a mess of legacy code and ‘we’ve always done it this way’ assumptions. Every meeting ended with more questions than answers, everyone agreeing it was ‘complex’ but nobody knowing where to even start. It was the kind of problem that makes you want to just give up and go home, or at least pretend your email isn’t working for a few hours. That’s when I pulled out a simple tool: first principles thinking.

First principles thinking isn’t some new-age guru nonsense. It’s a way of looking at a problem by breaking it down to its most fundamental truths, the things you know are absolutely certain, and then building up from there. You don’t reason by analogy (how others have done it) or by convention (how it’s always been done). You ask: what are the irreducible components here? What’s actually true? It’s a powerful way to get mental clarity when everything else feels fuzzy.

What Even Is First Principles Thinking?

Forget what you think you know. That’s the first step. When you approach a problem using first principles, you’re not asking, ‘What’s the best practice for X?’ or ‘How did Competitor Y solve this?’ You’re asking, ‘What is X, at its core? What are its fundamental elements?’ Think of it like a child asking ‘Why?’ over and over until you hit bedrock. You strip away assumptions, traditions, and convenient shortcuts until you’re left with the bare facts.

Take a simple example: building a chair. Most people would think, ‘Okay, I need a seat, four legs, a backrest.’ That’s reasoning by analogy. A chair already exists, and you’re just replicating it. First principles thinking would ask: what is the purpose of a chair? To support a human body in a seated position. What does a human body need for support? A surface to sit on, something to keep it from falling over, and maybe something to lean against for comfort. From there, you could invent something that looks nothing like a traditional chair but still serves the purpose. Maybe it’s a suspended sling, or a perfectly molded ergonomic block. The key is you’re starting from scratch, from the physics and human needs, not from pre-existing ideas.

Applying First Principles: The Stalled Project

Back to that onboarding project. We were stuck because everyone kept talking about ‘modules’ and ‘data syncing’ and ‘user roles’ — all existing parts of their broken system. When I applied first principles thinking, I asked:

🃏
Recommended Reading

The Mental Models Deck

50 Thinking Tools for Better Decisions

50 high-leverage thinking tools from philosophy, economics, and psychology. Print-ready flashcard deck.


Get the Deck → $16

★★★★★ (76)

  • What is the absolute core purpose of onboarding? To get a new user to successfully use the product’s primary feature, quickly and easily.
  • What does a user *actually need* to do that? Access to the product, a basic understanding of how it works, and a clear path to their first ‘win’.
  • What are the fundamental requirements for *our* product to achieve this? Authentication, basic profile setup, and access to the specific features relevant to their initial goal.

We realized the existing system tried to do too much. It forced users to set up advanced features they didn’t need yet, fill out lengthy profiles, and confirm emails multiple times. All these steps were ‘how we’ve always done it’ or ‘what our competitors do.’ But were they fundamentally necessary for a user to get to their first ‘win’ in our product? Nope. We stripped away 70% of the initial steps. The client pushed back, of course. ‘But we need their phone number for marketing!’ ‘We need them to select their industry!’ My response was simple: ‘Is that essential for them to use the product successfully right now, or is it an extra step we can ask for later, once they’ve seen value?’

That’s where the concrete gripe comes in: people resist this kind of thinking. It means challenging sacred cows and admitting that maybe, just maybe, the way you’ve always done things isn’t the best way. It feels like more work upfront because you’re dismantling something familiar. And honestly, it can make you unpopular in a meeting if you’re the one asking ‘why’ for the fifth time. But the payoff is immense.

How First Principles Saves Your Brain (and Wallet)

The beauty of this framework is its versatility. It’s not just for software projects. I use it for personal decisions too. Like when my budget felt stretched thin. Instead of just cutting ‘luxuries’ or trying to find a cheaper coffee, I asked: what is the fundamental purpose of money for me right now? Security, yes. But beyond that, what truly brings value? Is it accumulating things, or is it experiences and freedom? By breaking it down, I saw that I was spending on a lot of subscriptions I barely used, just because ‘everyone has them’ or ‘they’re only $10/month.’ That $10/month adds up. For instance, I was paying $29/month for a project management tool that I only used for about 10% of its features, because it was what I thought I ‘should’ use. A simple spreadsheet would have done the job for free. The free tier of some alternatives is enough for solo work, which I found after applying this thinking. That $29/month felt ridiculous for what I got, once I looked at the actual ‘first principles’ of my project tracking needs.

The concrete love I have for this approach is the clarity it brings. When you’re lost in the weeds of a problem, it’s like someone hands you a flashlight and tells you to look at the roots. It cuts through the noise. You stop chasing symptoms and start addressing the cause. It makes decision making so much cleaner. Instead of reacting, you’re building. When you see something like a complex workflow, you can ask, ‘What is the absolute minimum sequence of actions required to achieve this outcome?’ You’ll often find half the steps are just there out of habit or fear.

This thinking framework isn’t a silver bullet; it takes effort. It forces you to question deeply, to sit with uncertainty, and to ignore the easy answers. But the mental discipline it builds is worth more than any productivity hack. For anyone wanting to dig deeper into these kinds of mental models, a good starting point is often found in the classics of stoicism. Seneca talks about stripping things back to their essence. If you’re looking for an audio companion for your commute to explore more on practical philosophy, you might find something useful at https://audible.com/affiliate/stoic. It’s not about memorizing quotes; it’s about applying the principles.

When you’re faced with a seemingly impossible deadline, a client making unreasonable demands, or just a bad day where nothing seems to go right, don’t just react. Don’t just follow the usual path. Stop. Break it down. What are the absolute, undeniable truths of this situation? What can you control? What is the core objective? You’ll be surprised how often the ‘impossible’ problem shrinks to a manageable task once you strip away all the layers of assumption and complexity. It’s not always easy, but it’s always powerful.